Saturday, March 23, 2019

Foreshadowing in Oedipus the King and The Marriage of Figaro :: comparison compare contrast essays

Foreshadowing in Oedipus the queer and The Marriage of Figaro You are the curse, the decadency of the land. With these words, Tiresias, a blind prophet in Oedipus The King set the actions in play that would turn king to beggar within the day. Prophecy and foretell is an important part of playwriting, and adds an element of suspense that is not possible either other way. Whether it be the witches of MacBeth, the ramblings of Tiresias in Oedipus the King, and Antig unity, or whether it is the unrealized foreshadowing by Figaro in The Marriage of Figaro, foreshadowing launchs the reader or the audience something to sit themselves over, until the play or novel is actually over. It would not be a stretch of the imagination to say that some of the greatest plays ever indite would be impotent if their elements of foreshadowing was removed. Foreshadowing is defined, in Websters dictionary, as to give a hint or suggestion of beforehand. In drama, foreshadowing is in general used for several purposes, including the creation of tension, creation of atmosphere, and adds an element of credibility to a character. All of these are important elements of a play. However it is not unattackable to imagine a play in which more then one-half of the elements of a plot, namely exposition, discovery, point of attack, complication and crisis all be caused by an act of foreshadowing or prophecy. Indeed, Oedipus the King, which was considered the greatest play in history by Aristotle, was one such play. Oedipus the King was the story of the King of Thebes, Oedipus, and his dark past history which no one, including himself to a point, was aware of, one that involved abandonment, patricide and incest. Thebes was beset by a plague, and a delegation was direct to Apollo, the Greek God of healing, where they received instructions to find the murderer of the precedent king of Thebes, King Laius. This form of foreshadowing was necessary for the storyline to go thro ugh a starting place, and acts not only as foreshadowing, but in like manner as discovery, because it gave new information that moved the plot forwards. A paradox with this is the fact that it requires an act of God, something that Aristotle frowned upon in his definitive text

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.